Commoning is about complex and historically specific processes through which representation, practices and values intersect in circumscribing what is to be shared and how in a specific society. – Stavros Stavrides

Experiences of space commoning in contemporary metropolises create forms of shared public life that overspill the boundaries of existing public spaces. Common space produced through practices of urban commoning may give form to processes of cooperation which encourage encounters and offer opportunities of creative communication. If enclave spatiality corresponds to rules that enclose and corrupt commoning, threshold spatiality characterizes those common spaces that invite newcomers and are not identified with any self-enclosing community. Threshold spatiality corresponds to forms of selfmanagement that permit the expansion of commoning circles. Opposed to public spaces which are used under the rules established by specific authorities, common spaces emerge as urban thresholds through practices that rediscover democracy as praxis. The sharing between equals and the opening of the circles of sharing towards “‘outsiders’” necessarily implies creating forms and rules of urban social life that can profit from differences and encourage the participatory building of shared urban worlds. Drawing from examples related to the recent experiences of urban commoning in Mexican and Brazilian cities, this presentation will attempts to show that emerging common spaces may shape potentialities of different forms of social organization. It is through such experiences that autonomy as a political project may be re-problematized. Spaces of autonomy, thus, may be rethought not as “‘autonomous spaces’” but, rather as spaces of expanding commoning which potentially challenge the dominant “‘city of enclaves’”.

Guiding Questions:

  • What makes common space different from public space?
    Is urban space a good or a resource to be shared?
  • What does it mean to claim the right to the city in the context of urban commoning?
  • What is the role of urban communities in the definition of urban commons?
  • What kind of power relations define and sustain urban commoning? Is the arrangement of city spaces part of the process of establishing power geometries?
  • Can collective experiences of urban commoning be connected to struggles for social emancipation?
Posted in UEL
Posted by:Carolin Genz

Carolin Genz holds a master degree in European Ethnology and Urban Cultures from Humboldt-University of Berlin (2009-2013) and is currently doing research at the Department for Cultural and Social Geography at the Humboldt-University since 2015. Her Ph.D. topic is: "Urban Resistance: Upheaval of Civil Society? Ethnographical perspectives on the transformation of urban everyday life“. Specifically, her research focuses on practices of production and appropriation of space, urban governance and digital tools of urban resistance and network practices. Furthermore, she is an academic consultant and member of the advisory board for Gender Mainstreaming and Diversity for the Senate Department of Housing and Urban Development in Berlin.

One thought on “The production of common space (Prof. Stavros Stavrides)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s